Monday, May 22, 2023

Case No. 87 – Staten Island NY Home Loan Modification with JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA; Interest for Month Prior to Effectivity Date Charged Twice; No Accounting for Modified Balance; Total Payments at 201% of the Modified Balance Not Disclosed

This report on the findings of an examination is here presented for informational purposes only and is not to be construed as legal opinion or advice. The reader is advised to consult a competent legal professional in connection with the use of its contents..

The borrower is strongly advised to consult his/her loan servicer for any adverse findings that may be discovered in an examination of his/her loan modification agreement. 


The Home Affordable Modification Agreement that is the subject of this examination was among the documents that were presented for chain of title examination on May 3, 2023. This report and the accompanying Amortization Spreadsheet were prepared on May 16, 2023.

SUMMARY

1. The subject loan was granted by Great American Mortgage Corp. on March 9, 2006 for 
    $268,000.00. The promissory note was not presented in the chain of title examination. The 
    term and interest rate are unknown. 

2. The loan was modified with JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA effective August 1, 2013 for 
    $344,280.45 for 480 months with interest fixed at 4.000% p.a. 

3.The lender has charged the borrowers  twice for interest for the period July 1 to 31, 2013 
    which amounted to $1,147.60; first, by compounding it with the new principal balance as of 
    August 1, 2013 and again, by making it a part of the first installment that was due also on 
    August 1, 2013. 

4. There was a gap of more than seven years between the granting of the original loan and 
    the loan modification, yet the balance of the modified loan represents an increase of 
    $76,280.45 or 28% over the original loan.

    The balance of the loan prior to the modification is not stated in the agreement. It is 
    understood that the increase represents interest and other amounts capitalized as of 
    August 1, 2013. 

    A detailed accounting of the unpaid and deferred interest, fees, escrow advances and other 
    costs that were added to the loan balance in order to arrive at the modified loan balance 
    was not part of or attached to this agreement. 

5. The total amount that the borrowers will have to pay under the modification agreement is  
    $692,662.42.40 or 201% of the modified principal balance. This is not disclosed in the 
    agreement.

6. The agreement contains a provision that signifies that this loan transaction does not 
    partake of the nature of a new loan or a refinancing which is believed to be the basis for 
    the lender for not furnishing the borrowers a disclosure statement under the Truth-in-
    Lending Act. 

    No explanation was found as to why a loan transaction that is not a refinance and which 
    only involves a reduction in annual percentage rate does not fall within the scope of the 
    purpose of the law which is to “promote the informed use of consumer credit by requiring 
    disclosures about its terms and cost.”

The findings in this examination are not included in the Summary of Findings.


MAIN REPORT

Premises

The subject loan was granted on March 9, 2006 by Great American Mortgage Corp. for $268,000.00. The promissory note was not presented in the chain of title examination. The original term and maturity date and interest rate are unknown.

The borrowers entered into a Loan Modification Agreement with JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA that took effect on August 1, 2013. The modified amount is $344,280.45 and the term is 480 months. The maturity date is July 1, 2053. The modified amount is levied interest at 4.000% p.a. for the entire term of the agreement. Monthly payment for principal and interest is $14,438.88. 

The mortgaged property is in Staten Island, New York. This agreement was recorded in Richmond County on May 27, 2015.

It could not be ascertained if the promissory note has been endorsed.  The Mortgage has been assigned six times. The sixth assignment shows that the Mortgage is now owned by Legacy Mortgage Asset Trust 2020-GS5 with US Bank, NA as Owner Trustee.

Basic Features

The parts of the agreement that contain provisions relevant to this audit are reproduced below.


Section 1 of the agreement states that the modification effectivity date is August 1, 2013. The Unpaid Principal Balance is $344,280.45. This includes unpaid amounts loaned to the borrower plus any interest and other amounts capitalized.


Section 2 states that the Unpaid Principal Balance is levied interest at 4.00% p.a. from July 1, 2013 and that the first monthly payment of $1,438.88 was due on August 1, 2013. The maturity date is July 1, 2053 (which means that the term is 480 months). 

Examiner’s Comments

Double-Charging of Interest

1. The First Instance 

    1.1. The Amount Charged

           Section 1 of the agreement states that the new principal balance includes unpaid 
           amounts loaned to the borrower plus any interest and other amounts capitalized. The 
           new principal balance of $344,280.45 as of August 1, 2013 therefore includes interest 
           for the month of July, 2013. 

           Any unpaid interest that has been added to or compounded with the principal always 
           includes the interest for the month immediately prior to the compounding. This is 
           because payment for any arrears is applied first, to fees and/or costs and then to past 
           due interest and last, to past due principal. As for interest, payment is first applied to 
           the earliest period or month/s wherein interest is unpaid thereby leaving the interest for 
           the latter month/s still unpaid if the payment is not sufficient to cover all unpaid 
           interest. Thus, if any unpaid interest will be added to the principal, this interest will 
           always include that of the month immediately prior to the compounding. In this case, 
           that month is July, 2013.

           Section 2 of the agreement states that interest at 4.00% p.a. will begin to accrue on 
           the new principal balance as of July 1, 2013. 

           Thus, the amount of $344,280.45 is the sum of (a) the balance of the loan before the 
           interest for July, 2013 was added to it, plus (b) the interest for July, 2013 which is 
           4.00% p.a. (0.3333% for one month; 0.003333 in decimal terms) of the balance before 
           the addition. 


           The above computation shows that the amount of $1,143.79 as unpaid interest for the 
           month of July, 2013 was added to the loan balance of $343,136.66 in order to arrive at 
           the balance as of August 1, 2013 of $344,280.45 (This computation assumes that the 
           balance of $343,136.66 already includes any other interest and other amounts 
           capitalized).

    1.2. The Date of Charging

           The first instance of double-charging occurred on the effectivity date of the agreement 
           when the interest for the month of July, 2013 was added to the principal. The 
           agreement states that its effectivity date is August 1, 2013. It was signed by the 
           borrowers on July 17, 2013 and by the lender’s representative on July 29, 2013.

    1.3. The Date of Payment

           By including all amounts and arrearages in the new principal balance, the status of the 
           loan is updated to “current”. The unpaid interest as of August 1, 2013 is now 
           considered paid, but instead of the borrowers’ cash being depleted, their debt is 
           increased. This arrangement was initiated by the lender.

2. The Second Instance 

    2.1. The Amount Charged

           Interest in the amount of $1,147.60 is the product of multiplying $344,280.45, the 
           amount of modified principal, by 4.00% (or 0.040), the rate of interest per annum and 
           dividing the result by 12 months. This amount is affirmed by the lender through the 
           Amortization Spreadsheet, as demonstrated below: 

           (This spreadsheet was prepared using the amounts specified by the lender in the 
           agreement. The application of these amounts carries the implication that the payments 
           will be made by the borrowers as scheduled in the agreement.)


           a. The amount of monthly installment of $1,438.88 as specified in the agreement, 
               includes the interest of $1,147.60 for the first month as computed above, leaving 
               $291.28 to reduce the principal. The payment of $291.28 is then deducted from 
               $344,280.45, the previous balance of the modified principal, leaving an end-of-first 
               month balance of $343,989.17 (see Amortization Spreadsheet, Month No. 1). 

           b. In the second month, the same amount of monthly installment of $1,438.88 includes 
               the interest of $1,146.63 for the second month ($343,989.17 multiplied by 0.040, 
               divided by 12), leaving $292.25 to reduce the principal. The payment of $292.25 is 
               then deducted from $343,989.17, the balance from the first month, leaving an end-
               of-second month balance of $343,696.92 (See Amortization Spreadsheet, Month 
               No. 2). 

           c. The same procedure in paragraphs 2.a. and 2.b. is repeated from Month No. 3 until 
               the end of the term of the agreement. 

           d. Finally, the affirmation by the lender of the amount of $1,147.60 comes at the end of 
               the amortization spreadsheet wherein, after the repeated application of the 
               procedures of computation stated in this paragraph on the amounts specified by the 
               lender in the agreement, the loan will be fully paid.  There will be a rounding-off 
               difference of +$0.52 (see Amortization Spreadsheet, Month No. 480). 


               The proof of the affirmation is that the loan will be fully paid as computed using the 
               amounts specified by the lender. There would not have been such affirmation had 
               this computation resulted in a negative balance (overpayment). Thus, the lender 
               really intended to include the interest for the month of July, 2013 in the August 1, 
               2013 installment.

    2.2. The Date Charged

           The Amortization Spreadsheet is based on the dates and amounts stated in the 
           agreement. Thus, the effectivity date stated in Paragraph 1.2. also applies.

    2.3. The Date of Payment

           The second payment occurred when the borrower paid the first monthly installment. 
           This installment is assumed to have been paid unless the lender can show proof that 
           its non-payment is one of the causes of its current collection efforts and/or action to 
           foreclose.

3. Conclusion

    In the first instance of interest charging, interest for the month of July, 2013 in the amount 
    of  $1,143.79 was added by the lender to the loan balance in order to arrive at the modified 
    balance of $344,280.45 as of August 1, 2013. This interest is considered paid by the 
    borrowers on August 1, 2013 when it was made part of the modified loan balance.

    In the second instance of interest charging, the lender made the interest for August, 2013 
    amounting to $1,147.60 part of the first installment that was due on August 1, 2013. 
    Payment occurred when the borrower paid the first monthly installment. The first 
    installment is assumed to have been paid because almost three years have passed since it 
    became due and the loan is still current. 

    In loan modifications, unpaid interest as of the effectivity date of the modification 
    agreement is added to the principal in order to arrive at the modified balance. This will 
    include the interest for the month immediately preceding the effectivity date. A double-
    charging of interest occurs when the first monthly payment is made to fall due on 
    modification effectivity date. The interest double-charged will also be for the month 
    immediately preceding the effectivity date of the agreement.

    This double-charging can therefore be avoided by moving the due date of the first payment 
    one month after effectivity date. In doing so, the interest component of the first payment 
    would be the interest covering the month starting from the date of loan modification or loan 
    granting up to the day immediately before the due date of the first payment. This is the 
    usual practice for new loans and in some loan modifications and reflects the fact that the 
    lenders and servicers knew how to avoid double-charging their borrowers. 

Comparison

The features of the first modified loan are herein compared with those of the original loan.


Examiner’s Comments

There was a gap of more than seven years between the granting of the original loan and the loan modification, yet the balance of the modified loan represents an increase of $76,280.45 or 28% over the original loan.

The balance of the loan prior to the modification is not stated in the agreement. It is understood that the increase represents interest and other amounts capitalized as of August 1, 2013. 

A detailed accounting of the unpaid and deferred interest, fees, escrow advances and other costs that were added to the loan balance in order to arrive at the modified loan balance was not part of or attached to this agreement. 

Payments

The total amount that the borrowers will have to pay under the modification agreement is computed as follows. 


Examiner’s Comments

The total amount that the borrowers will have to pay under the modification agreement is $692,662.42.40 or 201% of the modified principal balance. This is not disclosed in the agreement.

See Amortization Spreadsheet.

Disclosure

The following provision signifies that this loan transaction does not partake of the nature of a new loan or a refinancing which is believed to be the basis for the lender for not furnishing the borrowers a disclosure under the Truth-in-Lending Act.


12 CFR § 226.20 on Subsequent Disclosure Requirements states that “a refinancing occurs when an existing obligation is satisfied and is replaced by a new obligation undertaken by the same consumer. A refinancing is a new transaction requiring new disclosures to the consumer” and that “a reduction in the annual percentage rate with a corresponding change in the payment schedule” “shall not be treated as a refinancing” (abridged). 

On the other hand, 12 CFR § 226.1 states that “the purpose of this regulation is to promote the informed use of consumer credit by requiring disclosures about its terms and cost.”

Examiner’s Comments

No explanation was found as to why a loan transaction that is not a refinance and which only involves a reduction in annual percentage rate does not fall within the purpose of the scope of the law which is “to promote the informed use of consumer credit by requiring disclosures about its terms and cost.” 

Some borrowers who are more familiar with ways of institutionalized lending would not need as much effort and assistance as others would in order to be fully informed of the costs of their respective uses of credit. In other words, the need to be furnished such quality of credit information as would inform a borrower about the terms and cost of his/her credit depends on the borrower. The need to be fully informed is not dictated by the type of credit, or whether a loan transaction is a refinance or a modification.

Moreover, the lack of disclosure could have left the borrowers unaware that (a) the balance of the loan modification is 28% higher than the balance of the original loan despite the gap of more than seven years between the granting of the original loan and the loan modification, and (b) the total amount that they will have to pay on the loan under the loan modification agreement is 201% of the modified balance. 


AMORTIZATION SPREADSHEET

Monthly amortizations based on the agreement are shown in detail in a spreadsheet. The amounts do not include payments intended for the escrow account. Selected pages of the spreadsheet are shown in the following pages for the purpose of explanation. A complete copy is attached to the printed report.

Line 1 shows the start of monthly amortizations in equal amounts to be applied to interest based on the diminishing balance of the principal and the principal. The interest rate and amount of monthly installments for the entire term of 480 months are 4.000% p.a. and $1,438.88.

The first payment that became due on August 1, 2013 covered (a) interest for the period July 1 to 31, 2013, based on the balance of $344,280.45 at 4.000% p.a.; and (b) a reduction of the balance of $344,280.45 by the remainder of $1,438.88 minus (a).


Page 1 shows that, assuming the monthly installments have been paid as scheduled, after the 30th payment, of the monthly installments totaling $43,166.40, $33,992.25 or 78.75% has been applied to interest and $9,174.15 has reduced the balance by 2.66%.


Page 2 shows that, assuming the monthly installments have been paid as scheduled, after the 60th payment, of the monthly installments totaling $86,332.80, $67,021.33 or 77.63% has been applied to interest and $19,311.47 has reduced the balance by 5.61%.


Page 3 shows that, assuming the monthly installments have been paid as scheduled, after the 90th payment, of the monthly installments totaling $129,499.20, $98,986.13 or 76.44% has been applied to interest and $30,513.47 has reduced the balance by 8.86%.


Line 118 above shows that, assuming the monthly installments have been paid as scheduled, as of May 1, 2023, the loan had a balance of $302,253.92. As of this date, interest has been paid up to April 30, 2023.

Page 4 shows that, assuming the monthly installments have been or will be paid as scheduled, after the 120th payment, of the monthly installments totaling $172,665.60, $129,774.90 or 75.16% has been or will be applied to interest and $42,890.70 will reduce the balance by 12.46%.


Page 8 shows that, assuming the monthly installments have been or will be paid as scheduled, after the 240th payment, of the monthly installments totaling $345,331.20, $238,497.64 or 69.06% has been or will be applied to interest and $106,833.56 will reduce the balance by 31.03%.


Page 12 shows that, assuming the monthly installments have been or will be paid as scheduled, after the 360th payment, of the monthly installments totaling $517,996.80, $315,835.13 or 60.97% has been or will be applied to interest and $202,161.67 will reduce the balance by 58.72%.


Page 16 shows that, assuming the monthly installments have been or will be paid as scheduled, after the 480th payment on July 1, 2053, the maturity date, of the monthly installments totaling $690,662.40, $346,382.47 or 50.15% has been or will be applied to interest and $344,279.93 will fully pay the loan. There will be a rounding-off difference of +$0.52.

End of article.

Case No.   >

Monday, May 15, 2023

Case No. 86 – Staten Island NY Home Loan Modification with HSBC Bank USA, NA as Trustee; No Accounting for Modified Balance; Total Payments at 159% of Modified Balance Not Disclosed

This report on the findings of an examination is here presented for informational purposes only and is not to be construed as legal opinion or advice. The reader is advised to consult a competent legal professional in connection with the use of its contents.

The borrower is strongly advised to consult his/her loan servicer for any adverse findings that may be discovered in an examination of his/her loan modification agreement. 


The Home Affordable Modification Agreement that is the subject of this examination was among the documents that were presented for securitization audit on February 21, 2023. This report and the accompanying Amortization Spreadsheet were prepared on May 8, 2023.

SUMMARY

1. The loan that was granted on February 7, 2006 for $539,000 payable in 360 months with 
    an adjustable interest rate starting at 7.750% p.a. for the first 12 months was modified 
    effective April 1, 2015 for $622,136.69 payable in 480 months. A graduated rate of interest 
    starting at 2.000% p.a. for the first 60 months was levied on the balance of $436,267.55. 
    $185,869.14 of the modified balance was treated as a non-interest-bearing “Deferred 
    Balance.”  

2. There was a gap of more than nine years between the granting of the original loan and the 
    date of modification, yet the modified principal balance represents an increase of 
    $83,136.69 or 15% of the original loan. 

    The agreement states that the amount payable under the note is $622,136.69. This 
    includes deferred and unpaid interest, fees, escrow advances and other costs but 
    excluding unpaid late charges and other charges not permitted under the terms of the 
    HAMP modification.

    A detailed accounting of the items that are referred to as deferred and unpaid interest, 
    fees, escrow advances and other costs was not a part of or attached to the agreement.

3. The total amount that the borrower will have to pay on the loan over the entire term of the 
    agreement is $989,954.10 or 159% of the modified principal balance. This is not stated in 
    the agreement. This includes the amount of $185,869.14 (30%) in balloon payment for the 
    deferred principal balance.

4. The agreement contains a provision that signifies that this loan transaction does not 
    partake of the nature of a new loan or a refinancing which is believed to be the basis for 
    the lender for not furnishing the borrower a disclosure statement under the Truth in-
    Lending Act (Regulation Z).

    No explanation was found as to why a loan transaction that is not a refinance and which 
    only involves a reduction in annual percentage rate does not fall within the scope of the 
    purpose of the law which is to “promote the informed use of consumer credit by requiring 
    disclosures about its terms and cost.”

The findings in this examination are not included in the Summary of Findings.


MAIN REPORT

Premises

The subject loan was granted on February 7, 2006 by All-American Home Mortgage Corp. for $539,000. The term was 360 months with an adjustable interest rate starting at 7.750% p.a. for the first 12 months. 

The borrower entered into a Home Affordable Modification Agreement with HSBC Bank USA, NA as Trustee for Deutsche Alt-A Securities, Inc. Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2007-AR3 that took effect on April 1, 2015. The modified amount was $622,136.69 and the term was 480 months to mature on April 1, 2055. $185,869.14 was deferred (the “Deferred Balance”) leaving a balance of $436,267.55 as the Interest-Bearing Balance. 

Interest was levied on the Interest-Bearing Balance starting at 2.000% p.a. from April 1, 2015, 3.000% p.a. from April 1, 2020 and 3.875% p.a. from April 1, 2021 onwards. 

Monthly payments for principal and interest were $1,321.13 from May 1, 2015, $1,534.85 from May 1, 2020 and $1,731.37 from May 1, 2021 onwards.

A final payment of an unspecified amount was due as the last payment to be applied to the loan balance on maturity date. This is understood to be the “Deferred Balance” of $185,869.14.

The mortgaged property is in Staten Island NY. The Mortgage was recorded in Richmond County on February 21, 2006.

The note has not been endorsed but the Mortgage has been assigned three times. The last assignee is HSBC Bank USA, NA as Trustee for Deutsche Alt-A Securities, Inc. Mortgage Loan Trust Series 2007-AR3.

Basic Features

The parts of the agreement that contain provisions relevant to this audit are reproduced below.


Section 3 of the agreement states that its effectivity date is April 1, 2015 and that the first modified payment will be due on May 1, 2015.

Section 3A states that the maturity date will be on April 1, 2055.


Section 3B states that the New Principal Balance is $622,136.69. This includes deferred and unpaid interest, fees, escrow advances and other costs but excluding unpaid late charges and other charges not permitted under the terms of the HAMP modification.


Section 3C states that $185,869.14 of th new principal balance shall be deferred and will be non-interest-bearing. The interest-bearing principal balance is $436,267.55. Interest at 2.00% will begin to accrue on this balance on April 1, 2015. The first monthly payment is due on May 1, 2015.

Section 3C lays out the schedule of payments as follows:


Examiner’s Comments

Double-Charging of Interest

There is no double charging of interest in this loan modification. The effectivity date of the agreement was April 1, 2015 and the due date of the first monthly payment was May 1, 2015. 

Comparison

The features of the modified loan are herein compared with those of the original loan.


Examiner’s Comments

There was a gap of more than nine years between the granting of the original loan and the date of modification, yet the modified principal balance represents an increase of $83,136.69 or 15% of the original loan. 

The agreement states that the amount payable under the note is $622,136.69. This includes deferred and unpaid interest, fees, escrow advances and other costs but excluding unpaid late charges and other charges not permitted under the terms of the HAMP modification.

A detailed accounting of the items that are referred to as deferred and unpaid interest, fees, escrow advances and other costs was not a part of or attached to the agreement.

Payments

The total amount that the borrower will have to pay under the modification agreement is computed as follows. 


Examiner’s Comments

The total amount that the borrower will have to pay on the loan over the entire term of the agreement is $989,954.10 or 159% of the modified principal balance. This is not stated in the agreement. This includes the amount of $185,869.14 (30%) in balloon payment for the deferred principal balance.

See Amortization Spreadsheet

Disclosure

The following provision signifies that this loan transaction does not partake of the nature of a new loan or a refinancing which is believed to be the basis for the lender for not furnishing the borrower a disclosure under the Truth-in-Lending Act.


12 CFR § 226.20 on Subsequent Disclosure Requirements states that “a refinancing occurs when an existing obligation is satisfied and is replaced by a new obligation undertaken by the same consumer. A refinancing is a new transaction requiring new disclosures to the consumer” and that “a reduction in the annual percentage rate with a corresponding change in the payment schedule” “shall not be treated as a refinancing” (abridged)

On the other hand, 12 CFR § 226.1 states that “the purpose of this regulation is to promote the informed use of consumer credit by requiring disclosures about its terms and cost.” 

Examiner’s Comments

No explanation was found as to why a loan transaction that is not a refinance and which only involves a reduction in annual percentage rate does not fall within the purpose of the scope of the law which is “to promote the informed use of consumer credit by requiring disclosures about its terms and cost.” 

Some borrowers who are more familiar with ways of institutionalized lending would not need as much effort and assistance as others would in order to be fully informed of the costs of their respective uses of credit. In other words, the need to be furnished such quality of credit information as would inform a borrower about the terms and cost of his/her credit depends on the borrower. The need to be fully informed is not dictated by the type of credit, or whether a loan transaction is a refinance or a modification.

Moreover, the lack of disclosure could have left the borrower unaware that (a) the modified principal balance represents an increase of 15% of the original loan despite the gap of more than nine years between the granting of the original loan and the date of modification and (b) the total amount that he will have to pay on the loan is $989,954.10 or 159% of the modified principal balance. This includes the amount of $185,869.14 (30%) in balloon payment for the deferred principal balance.


AMORTIZATION SPREADSHEET

Monthly amortizations based on the agreement are shown in detail in a spreadsheet. The amounts do not include payments intended for the escrow account. Selected pages of the spreadsheet for the purpose of explanation are shown in the following pages. A complete copy is attached to the printable report.

Line 1 shows the start of monthly amortizations in equal amounts applied to the principal and interest based on diminishing balances. The interest rate and monthly installments for the first 60 months are 2.000% p.a. and $1,321.13. 

The first payment that became due on May 1, 2015 covered (a) interest for the period April 1 to 30, 2015 based on the interest-bearing balance of $436,267.55 at 2.000% p.a.; and (b) a reduction of the interest-bearing balance of $436,267.55 by the remainder of $1,321.13 less (a). 


Page 1 shows that, assuming that monthly installments have been paid as scheduled, after the 30TH payment, of the monthly installments totaling $39,633.90, $21,375.94 or 53.93% has been applied to interest while $18,257.96 has reduced the interest-bearing balance by 2.93%.


Page 2 shows that, assuming that monthly installments have been paid as scheduled, after the 60TH payment, of the monthly installments totaling $79,267.80, $41,816.57 or 52.75% has been applied to interest while $37,451.23 has reduced the interest-bearing balance by 6.02%.

Line 61 shows the start of monthly amortizations from the 61ST to the 72ND month. Interest rate and amount of monthly payment are 3.000% p.a. and $1,534.85. 

Line 73 shows the start of monthly amortizations from the 73RD month onwards. Interest rate and amount of monthly payment are 3.875% p.a. and $1,731.37. 


Page 3 also shows that, assuming that monthly installments have been paid as scheduled, after the 90TH payment, of the monthly installments totaling $128,850.66, $76,258.89 or 59.18% has been applied to interest while $52,591.77 has reduced the interest-bearing balance by 8.45%.

Line 94 shows that, assuming that monthly installments have been paid as scheduled, the loan had an interest-bearing balance of $381,696.55 after applying the installment due for February 1, 2023. As of this date, interest has been paid up to January 31, 2023. 


Page 4 also shows that, assuming that monthly installments have been paid as scheduled, after the 120TH payment, of the monthly installments totaling $180,791.76, $112,714.48 or 62.34% has been or will be applied to interest while $68,077.28 will reduce the interest-bearing balance by 10.94%.


Page 8 shows that, assuming that monthly installments have been paid as scheduled, after the 240TH payment, of the monthly installments totaling $388,556.16, $241,131.51 or 62.06% has been or will be applied to interest while $147,424.65 will reduce the interest-bearing balance by 23.70%.


Page 12 shows that, assuming that monthly installments have been paid as scheduled, after the 360TH payment, of the monthly installments totaling $596,320.56, $332,066.95 or 55.69% has been or will be applied to interest while $264,253.61 will reduce the interest-bearing balance by 42.48%.


Page 16 shows that, assuming the monthly installments have been or will be paid as scheduled, after the 480TH payment on April 1, 2055, the maturity date, of the monthly installments totaling $804,084.96, $367,815.49 or 45.74% have been or will be applied to interest and $436,269.47 will fully pay the interest-bearing balance. The non-interest-bearing deferred balance of $185,869.14 will require a balloon payment in order to fully pay off the loan, There will be a rounding-off difference of -$1.92.

End of article.


Monday, February 13, 2023

Summary of Findings

The findings in this examination report are factual. This report is here presented for informational purposes only and is not to be construed as legal opinion or advice. The reader is advised to consult a competent legal professional in connection with the use of its contents.





Double-Charging of Interest

Number of home loan modification agreements reviewed – 85
Agreements found with double-charging of interest – 49; 58%
Amount of interest double-charged; range - $236.56 to $2,386.17; average - $1,001.64
Number of states with affected modifications – 12
Number of lenders/servicers involved – 19
Range of effectivity dates of the affected modifications – Feb 1 2009 to Jan 1 2020

Estimated effect on the number of loan modifications nationwide:
Total number of reported loan modifications – 5.14 million 
Estimated number of modifications with double-charging of interest – 2.98 million 
(58% of 5.14 million)
Estimated total amount of interest double-charged – $2.985 billion (2.98 million 
multiplied by $1,001.64)

Other findings:
Balloon payment requirement not stated in the agreement (but loan will still have a balance at maturity) – 2 of 44; 5%
Balloon payment requirement stated in the agreement but the amount is not specified – 13 of 44; 30%
No accounting for modified balance – 78 of 78 agreements 
Total payments as % of modified balance not disclosed – 81 of 81 agreements.

End of article.

Monday, December 12, 2022

Case No. 75 – Sherman Oaks CA Home Loan Modification with Bank of America, NA; Interest for Month Prior to Effectivity Date Charged Twice; No Accounting for Modified Balance; Total Payments at 160% of the Modified Balance Not Disclosed

This report on the findings of an examination is here presented for informational purposes only and is not to be construed as legal opinion or advice. The reader is advised to consult a competent legal professional in connection with the use of its contents.

The borrower is strongly advised to consult his/her loan servicer for any adverse findings that may be discovered in an examination of his/her loan modification agreement. 


The Home Affordable Modification Agreement that is the subject of this examination was among the documents that were presented for chain of title examination on November 9, 2021. This report and the accompanying Amortization Spreadsheet were prepared on July 18, 2022.


SUMMARY

1.  The subject loan was granted by America’s Wholesale Lender on March 15, 2007 for 
     $650,000.00 for 360 months. 

2.  The loan was modified with Bank of America, NA effective August 1, 2013 for $774,608.75 
     for 285 months with a graduated rate of interest starting at 2.000% p.a. for the first 36 
     months, 3.000% p.a. for the next 12 months and 3.375% p.a. for the remaining 237 
     months. Monthly payments for principal and interest are $2,345.71 starting on August 1, 
     2013, $2,744.51 starting on August 1, 2016, and $2,899.37 starting on August 1, 2017.

3.  The lender has charged the borrower twice for interest for the period July 1 to 31, 2013    
     which amounted to $1,291.01; first, by compounding it with the new principal balance as 
     of August 1, 2013 and again, by making it a part of the first installment that was due also 
     on August 1, 2013. 

4.  There was a gap of six years and five months between the granting of the original loan 
     and the effectivity date of the modification, yet the balance of the modified loan represents 
     an increase of $124,608.75 or 19% over the original loan.

     The modification agreement states that that the balance of $774,608.75 includes all 
     amounts and arrearages that will be past due as of the modification effectivity date. This 
     includes deferred interest, fees, charges, and other costs.

     The balance of the loan prior to the modification is not stated in the agreement. A detailed 
     accounting of the items that are referred to as amounts and arrearages that will be past 
     due as of modification effectivity date that are included in the modified principal balance is 
     not part of or attached to the agreement.

5.  The total amount that the borrower will have to pay under the modification agreement is 
     $1,239,259.31 or 160% of the modified principal balance. This total is not disclosed in the 
     agreement. It includes the balloon payment of $434,728.94. 

6.  The agreement contains a provision that signifies that this loan transaction does not 
     partake of the nature of a new loan or a refinancing which is believed to be the basis for 
     the lender for not furnishing the borrower a disclosure statement under the Truth-in-
     Lending Act (Regulation Z). 

     No explanation was found as to why a loan transaction that is not a refinance and which 
     only involves a reduction in annual percentage rate does not fall within the scope of the 
     purpose of the law which is to “promote the informed use of consumer credit by requiring 
     disclosures about its terms and cost.”


MAIN REPORT

Premises

The subject loan was granted on March 15, 2007 by America’s Wholesale Lender for $650,000.00. The term was for 360 months to mature on April 1, 2037. The promissory note was not presented in the examination.

The borrower entered into a Loan Modification Agreement with Urban Settlement Services, LLC as Attorney-in-Fact for Bank of America, NA as successor by merger to BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP that took effect on August 1, 2013. The modified amount is $774,608.75 and the term is 285 months. The maturity date remains on April 1, 2037. 

The modified balance was levied a graduated rate of interest at 2.000% p.a. for the first 36 months, 3.000% p.a. for the next 12 months and 3.375% p.a. for the remaining 237 months. Monthly payments for principal and interest are $2,345.71 starting on August 1, 2013, $2,744.51 starting on August 1, 2016, and $2,899.37 starting on August 1, 2017.

The mortgaged property is in Sherman Oaks, California. This agreement was recorded in Los Angeles County on March 27, 2007.

America’s Wholesale Lender was the trade name for Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., a subsidiary of Countrywide Financial. 

Countrywide Financial was acquired by Bank of America, NA in 2008.

Basic Features

The parts of the agreement that contain provisions relevant to this examination are reproduced below.







Section 3 of the agreement states that the modification effectivity date is August 1, 2013 and the maturity date is April 1, 2037.


Section 3A states that the modified principal balance includes all amounts and arrearages that will be past due as of the modification effectivity date. This includes deferred interest, fees, charges, and other costs. The amount is $774,608.75.


The first paragraph of Section 3B states that interest at 2.000% p.a. will begin to accrue on July 1, 2013 and the first monthly payment is due on August 1, 2013.


The schedule in the second paragraph of Section 3B shows the stages of graduated interest rates, the corresponding amounts of monthly instalments and the number of payments and the due date for the first payment for each stage.


The third paragraph of Section 3B states that the amounts of monthly payments were computed based a period of 480 months whereas the term of the agreement is only for 284 months. This resulted in smaller amounts of monthly amortizations than what would have been had the computation was based on the actual term of the agreement. 

The effect on payments is that a certain balance would be left unpaid on maturity date. The agreement states that the amount is $434,728.94 which is subject to a balloon payment.

Examiner’s Comments

Double-Charging of Interest

1.  The First Instance 

     1.1.  The Amount Charged

             Section 3A of the agreement states that the new principal balance includes all 
             amounts and arrearages that will be past due as of the modification effectivity date 
             including unpaid and deferred interest, fees, charges, and other costs. The new 
             principal balance of $774,608.75 as of August 1, 2013 therefore includes interest for 
             the month of July, 2013. 

             Any unpaid interest that has been added to or compounded with the principal always 
             includes the interest for the month immediately prior to the compounding. This is 
             because payment for any arrears is applied first, to fees and/or costs and then to past 
             due interest and last, to past due principal. As for interest, payment is first applied to 
             the earliest period or month/s wherein interest is unpaid thereby leaving the interest 
             for the latter month/s still unpaid if the payment is not sufficient to cover all unpaid 
             interest. Thus, if any unpaid interest will be added to the principal, this interest will 
             always include that of the month immediately prior to the compounding. In this case, 
             that month is July, 2013.

             The first paragraph of Section 3B of the agreement states that interest at 2.000% p.a. 
             will begin to accrue on July 1, 2013.

             Thus, the amount of $774,608.75 is the sum of (a) the balance of the loan before the 
             interest for July, 2013 was added to it plus (b) the interest for July, 2013 which is 
             2.00% p.a. (0.1667% for one month; 0.001667 in decimal terms) of the balance 
             before the addition. 


             The above computation shows that the amount of $1,289.12 as unpaid interest for 
             the month of July, 2013 was added to the loan balance in order to arrive at the 
             balance as of August 1, 2013 of $774,608.75 (This computation assumes that the 
             balance of  $773,319.63 already includes the unpaid fees, charges, and other costs).

     1.2.  The Date of Charging

             The first instance of double-charging occurred on the effectivity date of the 
             agreement when the interest for the month of July, 2013 was added to the principal. 
             The agreement states that its effectivity date is August 1, 2013. It was signed by the 
             borrower on August 8, 2013 and by the lender’s representative on August 29, 2013.

     1.3.  The Date of Payment

             By including all amounts and arrearages in the new principal balance, the status of 
             the loan is updated to “current”. The unpaid interest as of August 1, 2013 is now 
             considered paid, but instead of the borrower’s cash being depleted, his debt is 
             increased. This arrangement was initiated by the lender.

2.  The Second Instance 

     2.1.  The Amount Charged

             Interest in the amount of $1,291.01 is the product of multiplying $774,608.75, the 
             amount of modified principal, by 2.00% (or 0.020), the rate of interest per annum and 
             dividing the result by 12 months. This amount is affirmed by the lender through the 
             Amortization Spreadsheet, as demonstrated below: 

             (This spreadsheet was prepared using the amounts specified by the lender in the 
             agreement. The application of these amounts carries the implication that the 
             payments will be made by the borrower as scheduled in the agreement.)


             a.  The amount of monthly installment of $2,345.71 as specified in the agreement, 
                   includes the interest of $1,291.01 for the first month as computed above, leaving 
                   $1,054.70 to reduce the principal. The payment of $1,054.70 is then deducted 
                   from $774,608.75, the balance of the modified principal, leaving a balance of 
                   $773,554.05 (see Amortization Spreadsheet, Month No. 1). 

             b.  In the second month, the same amount of monthly installment of $2,345.71 
                  includes the interest of $1,289.26 for the second month ($773,554.05 multiplied 
                  by 0.020, divided by 12), leaving $1,056.45 to reduce the principal. The payment 
                  of $1,056.45 is then deducted from $773,554.05, the balance from the first month, 
                  leaving a balance of $772,497.60 (See Amortization Spreadsheet, Month No. 2). 

             c.  The same procedure in paragraphs 2.1.a. and 2.1.b. above is repeated from 
                  Month No. 3 until the end of the term of the agreement while taking into 
                  consideration the changes in interest rate and amount of monthly instalments 
                  which are 2.000% p.a. and $2,345.71, respectively for the first 36 months, 3.000% 
                  p.a. and $2,744.51 starting August 1, 2016 and 3.375% p.a. and $2,899.37 
                  starting August 1, 2017.
                     
             d.  Finally, the affirmation by the lender of the amount of $1,291.01 comes at the end 
                  of the amortization spreadsheet wherein, after the repeated application of the 
                  procedures of computation stated in this paragraph on the amounts specified by 
                  the lender in the agreement, the loan will retain a balance of $434,730.31 which, 
                  as stated in the agreement is subject to balloon payment (see Amortization 
                  Spreadsheet, Month No. 285). 


                  The proof of the affirmation is that the loan will retain the balance of $434,730.31. 
                  The agreement states that a balance of $434,728.94 is subject to balloon payment 
                  on maturity date. (There is a rounding-off difference of $1.37.) There would not 
                  have been such affirmation had this computation resulted in a lesser balance of 
                  material amount. Thus, the lender really intended to include the interest for the 
                  month of July, 2013 in the August 1, 2013 installment.

     2.2.  The Date Charged

             The Amortization Schedule is based on the dates and amounts stated in the 
             agreement. Thus, the effectivity date stated in Paragraph 1.2. also applies.

     2.3.  The Date of Payment

             The second payment occurred when the borrower paid the first monthly installment. 
             This installment is assumed to have been paid unless the lender can show proof that 
             its non-payment is one of the causes of its current collection efforts and/or action to 
             foreclose.

3.  Conclusion

     In the first instance of interest charging, interest for the month of July, 2013 in the amount 
     of $1,289.12 was added by the lender to the loan balance in order to arrive at the modified 
     balance of $774,608.75 as of August 1, 2013. This interest was paid by the borrower on 
     August 1, 2013 upon its addition.

     In the second instance of interest charging, the lender made the interest for July, 2013 
     amounting to $1,291.01 part of the first installment that was due on August 1, 2013. 
     Payment occurred when the borrower paid the first monthly installment. The first 
     installment is assumed to have been paid because nine years have passed since the first 
     installment became due and the loan is still current. 

     In loan modifications, unpaid interest as of the effectivity date of the modification 
     agreement is added to the principal in order to arrive at the modified balance. A double-
     charging of interest occurs when the first monthly payment is made to fall due on 
     modification effectivity date. The interest double-charged will be for the month immediately 
     preceding the effectivity date of the agreement.

     This double-charging can therefore be avoided by moving the due date of the first 
     payment one month after effectivity date. In doing so, the interest component of the first 
     payment would be the interest covering the month starting from the date of loan 
     modification or loan granting up to the day immediately before the due date of the first 
     payment. This is the usual practice for new loans and some loan modifications and reflects 
     the fact that the lenders and servicers knew how to avoid double-charging their borrowers. 

Comparison

The features of the modified loan are herein compared with those of the original loan.


Examiner’s Comments

There was a gap of six years and five months between the granting of the original loan and the effectivity date of the modification, yet the balance of the modified loan represents an increase of $124,608.75 or 19% over the original loan.

The modification agreement states that that the balance of $774,608.75 includes all amounts and arrearages that will be past due as of the modification effectivity date. This includes deferred interest, fees, charges, and other costs.

The balance of the loan prior to the modification is not stated in the agreement. A detailed accounting of the items that are referred to as amounts and arrearages that will be past due as of modification effectivity date, total amount not specified, that are included in the modified principal balance is not part of or attached to the agreement.

Payments

The total amount that the borrower will have to pay under the modification agreement is computed as follows.


Examiner’s Comments

The total amount that the borrower will have to pay under the modification agreement is $1,239,259.31 or 160% of the modified principal balance. This total is not disclosed in the agreement. It includes the balloon payment of $434,728.94 which accounts for 56%.

See Amortization Spreadsheet.

Disclosure

The following provision signifies that this loan transaction does not partake of the nature of a new loan or a refinancing which is believed to be the basis for the lender for not furnishing the borrower a disclosure under the Truth-in-Lending Act.


12 CFR § 226.20 on Subsequent Disclosure Requirements states that “a refinancing occurs when an existing obligation is satisfied and is replaced by a new obligation undertaken by the same consumer. A refinancing is a new transaction requiring new disclosures to the consumer” and that “a reduction in the annual percentage rate with a corresponding change in the payment schedule” “shall not be treated as a refinancing” (abridged). 

On the other hand, 12 CFR § 226.1 states that “the purpose of this regulation is to promote the informed use of consumer credit by requiring disclosures about its terms and cost.” 

Examiner’s Comments

No explanation was found as to why a loan transaction that is not a refinance and which only involves a reduction in annual percentage rate does not fall within the purpose of the scope of the law which is “to promote the informed use of consumer credit by requiring disclosures about its terms and cost.” 

Undeniably, some borrowers who are more familiar with ways of institutionalized lending would not need as much effort and assistance as others would in order to be fully informed of the costs of their respective uses of credit. In other words, the need to be furnished such quality of credit information as would inform a borrower about the terms and cost of his/her credit depends on the borrower. The need to be fully informed is not dictated by the type of credit, or whether a loan transaction is a refinance or a modification.

Moreover, the lack of disclosure could have left the borrower unaware that (a) the modification balance is 19% higher than the original loan despite the gap of six years and five months between the granting of the original loan and the effectivity date of the modification, and (b) the total amount that he will have to pay on the loan under the modification agreement is 160% of the modified balance. The balloon payment represents 56% of this total.


AMORTIZATION SPREADSHEET

Monthly amortizations based on the agreement are shown in detail in a spreadsheet. The amounts do not include payments intended for the escrow account. Selected pages of the spreadsheet are shown in the following pages. A complete copy is attached to the printed report.

Line 1 shows the start of monthly amortizations in equal amounts to be applied to interest based on the diminishing balance of the principal and the principal. The interest rate and amount of monthly instalments for the first 36 months are 2.000% p.a. and $2,345.71.

The first payment that became due on August 1, 2013 covered (a) interest for the period July 1 to 31, 2013, based on the balance of $774,608.75 at 2.000% p.a.; and (b) a reduction of the balance of $774,608.75 by the remainder of $2,345.71 minus (a).


Page 1 shows that, assuming the monthly instalments have been paid as scheduled, after the 30th payment, of the monthly instalments totalling $70,371.30, $37,953.75 or 53.93% has been applied to interest and $32,417.55 has reduced the balance by 4.19%.

Line 37, page 2 shows the start of monthly amortizations for the next 12 months starting on August 1, 2016. The interest rate and amount of monthly instalments are 3.000% p.a. and $2,744.51.


Line 49, page 2 shows the start of monthly amortizations for the remainder of the term starting on August 1, 2017. The interest rate and amount of monthly instalments are 3.375% p.a. and $2,899.37.

Page 2 also shows that, assuming the monthly instalments have been paid as scheduled, after the 60th payment, of the monthly instalments totalling $152,172.12, $91,552.64 or 60.16% has been applied to interest and $60,619.48 has reduced the balance by 7.83%.


Page 3 shows that, assuming the monthly instalments have been paid as scheduled, after the 90th payment, of the monthly instalments totalling $239,153.22, $150,675.89 or 63.00% has been applied to interest and $88,477.33 has reduced the balance by 11.42%.

Line 104, page 4 shows that, assuming the monthly instalments have been paid as scheduled, as of March 1, 2022, the loan had a balance of $672,305.69. As of this date, interest has been paid up to February 28, 2022.


Page 4 also shows that, assuming the monthly instalments have been or will be paid as scheduled, after the 120th payment, of the monthly instalments totalling $326,134.32, $207,350.22 or 63.58% has been or will be applied to interest and $118,784.10 will reduce the balance by 15.33%.


Page 7 shows that, assuming the monthly instalments have been or will be paid as scheduled, after the 210th payment, of the monthly instalments totalling $587,077.62, $360,430.53 or 61.39% has been or will be applied to interest and $226,647.09 will reduce the balance by 29.26%.


Page 10 shows that, assuming the monthly instalments have been or will be paid as scheduled, after the 285th payment on April 1, 2037, the maturity date, of the monthly instalments totalling $804,530.37, $464,651.93 or 57.75% has been or will be applied to interest and $339,878.44 will reduce the balance to $434,730.31, which, the agreement states, is subject to balloon payment. The agreement states that the balance is actually $434,728.94. There is a rounding-off difference of $1.37.

End of article.